Search Directories - North America | Europe | UK | Australia | Asia | Get a Free Email | Trading Board | Free Classified Ads
 Submit Articles
 Author Login


Community News & Articles 
 
 World News
 Africa
 Asia
 Australia
 Central America
 Europe
 Middle East
 New Zealand
 North America
 South America
 United Kingdom
 India
 Caribbean
 
 Sports News
 Basketball
 Football
 Soccer
 Others
 Golfing
 Hunting
 
 Entertainment
 Movies
 Music
 Television
 Games
 
 Internet Articles
 Internet Design Articles
 Internet Marketing Tips
 Search Engine Help
 
 Fashion Articles and News
 
 Health Articles and News
 Health and Beauty
 Diseases
 
 Social and Cultural Issues
 Wedding
 Dating
 
 Women Issues and Articles
 
 Business and Industry
 Real Estate Properties
 Travel and Holidays
 Insurance
 Loans
 Stock and Trading
 
 Weight Loss / Management
 
 Science & Technology
 Telephony and Voip
 MP3 and iPod
 Conferencing Calling
 
 Environment
 
 Finance and Business
 
 Home & Family
 Food and Cooking
 Crafts
 Decorations
 
 United Nation
Search

Fashion Articles and News Last Updated: Feb 18th, 2008 - 14:39:01


The shape of things to wear: scientists identify how women's figures have changed in 50 years
By Helen McCormack
Nov 21, 2005, 09:55

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
(Independent News & Media) The fashion industry is ignoring the changing shapes of women's bodies, a study claims today. Designers and manufacturers still insist on making clothes that fit the traditional hourglass figure, when women's shapes are more likely to be top-heavy, rectangular or pear-shaped.

The research found that although only 8 per cent of women now had the sort of hourglass figure flaunted by curvaceous 1950s film stars such as Sophia Loren, designers and manufacturers continued to make clothes to fit a slim-line version of that figure.

Of the 6,000 women's body shapes analysed, 46 per cent were described as rectangular, with the waist less than nine inches smaller than the hips or bust. Just over 20 per cent of women were bottom-heavy "spoons", or pear shapes, with hips two inches larger than busts or more, while almost 14 per cent were "inverted triangles" - women whose busts were three or more inches bigger than their hips.

The study, by the North Carolina State University, was based on data from a two-year study of American body types, SizeUSA. It was commissioned by Alva Products, a manufacturer of designers' mannequins determined to force the industry to design clothes for the majority rather than the minority of women.

Janice Wang, the firm's chief executive, said: "The majority of retailers are designing clothes for people with an hourglass figure." She added that industry standards for size measurements were out of date. "That needs to change if the industry wants to serve the markets they currently aren't reaching."

The fashion house Liz Claiborne has taken note. David Baron, a vice-president, said it would introduce "gradual changes" to eventually provide "better-fitting" clothes.

Although the study concentrated on American women, its implications were relevant for British women, Ms Wang said, because eating habits and lifestyle meant the shapes of women in the two societies "mirrored each other".

The British fashion designer Katherine Hamnett agreed that women who did not conform to a svelte size 10 continued to be neglected by fashion.
"The fashion industry ignores the true size of women at its peril," she said. "As to why they do, stupidity is the only reason I can think of. It is the result of adhering unthinkingly to a tradition."

And the idea that larger women are not the ideal to design for is a myth. "I have measured film stars who have 42 inch hips, and are still getting a lot of work. It is not how fat you are, it is whether you are fit that matters. People can be beautiful when they are any shape or size."

Breast enhancements and other types of cosmetic surgery could influence the findings, Ms Hamnett said. With breast enhancements likely to create the "inverted triangle" body type, the popularity of cosmetic surgery means there are new shapes that are less likely to be affected by diet or exercise.

The findings concur with a similar study of British women, SizeUK, published late last year, which found that the average woman's waistline had expanded by six inches since the 1950s.

Carried out by University College London and the London College of Fashion, the study found that women and men had shot up and out, with today's woman taller, with a bigger bust and hips than her 1950s counterpart.

Hourglass

Exemplified by the actress Sophia Loren, only 8 per cent of women tend to have equal hip and bust measurements with a narrow waist

The spoon

Just over 20 per cent of women, like Jennifer Lopez, have a pear-shaped figure, where the hip measurement is larger than the bust

Rectangular

Forty-six per cent of women fit this shape, where the waist is less than nine inches smaller than the hips or bust. Mel C is a good example

Inverted triangle

Another modern outline, where the bust is bigger than the hips. The swimmer Sharron Davies is one of the 14 per cent who fits this shape

Top of Page

 

Post an instant comment or a suggestion to the above article or news

Note: You can use the above link to form a new discussion forum, place your opinion and discuss events, politics, articles, environment, fashion, health, internet, search engines, marketing, movies, music, religion and any other topic.

Fashion Articles and News
Latest Headlines
» Securing Your Future in Fashion Merchandising
» Why You Should Read Fashion Magazines
» The Importance of Fashion Trends
» The Art, Science and Trade that is Fashion Design
» More than Just a Fashion School
» Merchandising and the Fashion Industry
» Learn About Fashion Merchandising Online
» Fashion Runways - Gateways to Modern Style
» Fashion Colleges for Your Fashion Careers
» Are You a Fashionable Woman?