Search Directories - North America | Europe | UK | Australia | Asia | Get a Free Email | Trading Board | Free Classified Ads
 Submit Articles
 Author Login


Community News & Articles 
 
 World News
 Africa
 Asia
 Australia
 Central America
 Europe
 Middle East
 New Zealand
 North America
 South America
 United Kingdom
 India
 Caribbean
 
 Sports News
 Basketball
 Football
 Soccer
 Others
 Golfing
 Hunting
 
 Entertainment
 Movies
 Music
 Television
 Games
 
 Internet Articles
 Internet Design Articles
 Internet Marketing Tips
 Search Engine Help
 
 Fashion Articles and News
 
 Health Articles and News
 Health and Beauty
 Diseases
 
 Social and Cultural Issues
 Wedding
 Dating
 
 Women Issues and Articles
 
 Business and Industry
 Real Estate Properties
 Travel and Holidays
 Insurance
 Loans
 Stock and Trading
 
 Weight Loss / Management
 
 Science & Technology
 Telephony and Voip
 MP3 and iPod
 Conferencing Calling
 
 Environment
 
 Finance and Business
 
 Home & Family
 Food and Cooking
 Crafts
 Decorations
 
 United Nation
Search

World News : Europe Last Updated: May 5th, 2008 - 22:12:50


Food aid alone will not solve global food crisis, economist tells EU
By Leigh Phillips
May 5, 2008, 22:12

Email this article
 Printer friendly page
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - The EU should provide structural aid to increase yields from peasant farmers in poor countries if it wants to help the global food crisis rather than just throwing emergency food aid at the problem, American economist Jeffrey Sachs told the European Parliament on Monday (5 May).

"If we just stay at the level of emergency food aid, we will not solve the problem," said the economist who is instead urging the bloc to look at ways to help farmers boost food production.

Emergency food aid is a response that should indeed be applied, he said, but "in the most short term" with a "time horizon of just the next six months. It won't solve anything longer term. For a longer term solution, we need to address the structural supply."

"Rather than just shipping expensive food aid, we should be helping the poorest of the poor to grow more food."

The biggest success story of this sort, said Mr Sachs, has been the doubling of food production in Malawi in last three years. "This can be replicated in many places, and I urge the EU to follow this kind of logic."

The former advisor to ex-UN-Secretary-General Kofi Annan and repentant architect of the 'shock therapy' market strategy that was applied to Bolivia in the mid-1990s and Eastern Europe after the fall of the Berlin Wall told the parliament's development committee that the crisis in food prices around the world was a product of "growing world demand for food hitting against rather stagnant supply."

This crisis of supply and demand was in turn caused by a series of factors. Food production in poor regions was "far below what it should be." These regions, he said, are producing only a third or even a quarter of their potential food output. The solution, he said, is to raise food output to levels that meet their full potential.

Additionally, food production is being hit by "a number of climate shocks" in recent years, with changed weather patterns affecting harvests.

The American economist also added his voice to the growing criticism of biofuels saying: "We should cut back significantly on our biofuels programmes, which were understandable at a time of much lower food prices and much lower food stocks but do not make sense now at a time of global food scarcity condition."

EU leaders last spring agreed that the EU should increase the use of biofuels in transport fuel to ten percent by 2020, up from a planned 5.75 percent target to be achieved by 2010.

In the wake of criticisms of the policy from the UN World Food Programme, the World Bank and its own scientists, the EU last week claimed that although American biofuels policies are affecting food prices, its own strategies are having only a minimal effect. But Mr Sachs argues this is false.

"The biofuel impact is greater in the US because it's a larger programme. In Europe, it's still a real impact though due to two things: to a modest extent food, wheat for example, is used for creating biofuels in Europe and that amount is to multiply considerably in the years ahead. Secondly, land that is crop-growing land is diverted from grains to rapeseed and other inputs for biodiesel."

"The US has a larger impact, but neither of them makes much sense in terms of the environmental effect, the energy balances or the food impact," he said.

He favours instead second generation biofuels research. "I'm a strong supporter of gaining expertise by research into biofuels that do not compete with foodstuff, such as cellulosic ethanols, which are not yet ready for commercial application but need more research.

Mr Sachs would also like to see more funding on research into improved seed varieties that are drought and "climate-proof", as "these climate shocks will continue to come."

However, he stressed that this meant conventional crops, along with increased use of fertilisers and small-scale irrigation, and not genetically modified organisms.

Top of Page

 

Post an instant comment or a suggestion to the above article or news

Note: You can use the above link to form a new discussion forum, place your opinion and discuss events, politics, articles, environment, fashion, health, internet, search engines, marketing, movies, music, religion and any other topic.

Europe
Latest Headlines
» Putin in control as Russia names cabinet
» Serbia's pro-Europe forces claim election win
» Neo-Nazi killing puts spotlight on Italian militants
» Dutch author J.J. Voskuil dies in euthanasia case
» Food aid alone will not solve global food crisis, economist tells EU
» Brussels to make suggestions on eurozone's future
» Africa's trade unions want EU trade agreements scrapped
» Three dead babies found in freezer in Germany
» Court rules elderly sisters are not legal couple
» Russia steps up forces in Georgia conflict zone